Back to leaderboard
Help center benchmark

Bolt benchmark

Report for

Bolt scored 99/100 on the DocsAlot benchmark report across 22 published checks. This Help center benchmark shows where agents can use these docs cleanly and where the biggest points of friction still are.

Last checked: May 4, 2026Category: ProductivityBenchmark type: Help center benchmarkSource: DocsAlot benchmark
Score your docs
Benchmark score
99Grade A

This report passes 18 of 22 checks, with 2 warnings, 1 failed checks, and 1 skipped checks still shaping the next score lift.

Checks passed
18/22
Warnings
2
Failed checks
1
Search page context

Why Bolt matters for self-serve support

Help-center documentation now does double duty: it supports humans directly and powers support agents, AI search, and onboarding flows behind the scenes. This benchmark shows whether the docs are structured well enough to keep support interactions self-serve.

Good help-center documentation is easy to discover, fetch, and follow, with clear hierarchy, concrete recovery paths, and enough task detail that users and agents can solve issues without escalation.

What this report means

What this documentation benchmark says about Bolt.

These are the clearest signals behind the current score. Start with the strengths that already support discovery and implementation, then use the gaps below to prioritize the fixes most likely to improve AI readability and self-serve onboarding.

Working well

Where the docs already help.

  • URL stability and redirects is already a strength, with a 100/100 score.
  • Authentication and access is already a strength, with a 100/100 score.
  • Content structure is already a strength, with a 100/100 score.

For the broader pattern behind these wins, review AI-readable documentation and compare this page with the full docs benchmark leaderboard.

Improve next

What to fix for better self-serve.

  • Improve content start position in page size and truncation risk.
  • Improve lLMS TXT valid in content discoverability.
  • Improve markdown content parity in observability and content health.

If you want to improve the system behind these gaps, start with API docs automation, the OpenAPI to CLI generator, and this guide to making docs AI-readable.

Check results

Full score breakdown

Open each category to review the checks behind the score and see exactly where agents still hit friction.

Page Size and Truncation Risk
3 passed1 failed

Can an agent read the page without losing important context?

1 failed check still shape this area.
Rendering Strategy

All 10 sampled pages contain server-rendered content

Page Size Markdown

All 9 pages under 50K chars (median 3K, max 9K)

Page Size Html

All 10 sampled pages convert under 50K chars (median 3K, 0% boilerplate)

Content Start Position

1 of 10 sampled pages have content starting past 50% (worst 107%)

Observability and Content Health
2 passed1 warnings

Can an agent tell whether the docs are fresh and trustworthy?

1 warning still need cleanup here.
LLMS TXT Freshness

llms.txt covers 100% of 76 sitemap doc pages; 1 llms.txt links not in sitemap (may indicate stale links or incomplete sitemap)

Markdown Content Parity

1 of 9 pages have minor content differences between markdown and HTML

Cache Header Hygiene

All 11 endpoints have appropriate cache headers

URL Stability and Redirects
2 passed

Can an agent trust that URLs will stay predictable?

This area is already one of the stronger parts of the report.
Http Status Codes

All 10 sampled pages return proper error codes for bad URLs

Redirect Behavior

No redirects detected across 10 sampled pages

Authentication and Access
1 passed1 skipped

Can an agent access the docs without getting blocked?

1 check were skipped in this report.
Auth Gate Detection

All 10 sampled pages are publicly accessible

Auth Alternative Access

All docs pages are publicly accessible; no alternative access paths needed

Content Structure
3 passed

Can an agent understand how the page is organized?

This area is already one of the stronger parts of the report.
Tabbed Content Serialization

No tabbed content detected across 10 sampled pages

Section Header Quality

No tabbed content found; header quality check not applicable

Markdown Code Fence Validity

All 0 code fences properly closed across 10 pages

Markdown Availability
2 passed

Can an agent fetch a clean text version of the docs?

This area is already one of the stronger parts of the report.
Markdown Url Support

9/9 sampled pages support .md URLs (100%)

Content Negotiation

9/9 sampled pages support content negotiation (100%)

Content Discoverability
5 passed1 warnings

Can an agent find the right starting point?

1 warning still need cleanup here.
LLMS TXT Exists

llms.txt found at 1 location(s)

LLMS TXT Valid

llms.txt contains parseable links but doesn't fully follow the proposed structure: https://support.bolt.new/llms.txt: No blockquote summary found

LLMS TXT Size

llms.txt is 12,219 characters (under 50,000 threshold)

LLMS TXT Links Resolve

All 10 same-origin sampled links resolve (78 total links)

LLMS TXT Links Markdown

10/10 same-origin sampled links point to markdown content (100%) (1 external link excluded)

LLMS TXT Directive (HTML)

llms.txt directive found in all 9 sampled pages, near the top of content; 1 failed to fetch

Next steps

Get this report in your inbox or track the score over time.

Save the report to a work email now, or tell us what kind of ongoing monitoring would be useful for this docs site.

Report delivery

Email me the full report

Save this report to a work email so you can revisit the score and the next fixes later.

Monitoring

Monitor your docs performance

Pick the monitoring path that best matches what you would want next from this benchmark.

Keep exploring

Use this report as a real search entry point.

Compare related benchmark reports, then move into the guides and tools that improve documentation benchmark scores.

Built by DocsAlot

Need help improving the score?

DocsAlot helps teams improve help centers, developer docs, API docs, and CLI docs so they are easier for humans to use and easier for agents to read.